recent entries
calendar
friends
profile
send jay email
talk to jay on aim
previous 25 entries

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

(30 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, January 6th, 2009


Since my livejournal account expired, my new recreational activity is creating a narrative from the bizarre keywords inside the crapass snapshots rollover thing.

(25 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, September 18th, 2008
From Chapter 3 "Mungerisms: Charlie Unscripted --(Highlights from the recent Berkshire Hathaway and Wesco Financial meetings)" in the book Poor Charlie's Almanac -- Wit and Wisdom of Charles T Munger.

People don't think about the consequences of the consequences. People start by trying to hedge against interest rate changes, which is very difficult and complicated. Then, the hedges make the [reported profits] lumpy. So then they use new derivatives to smooth this. Well, now you've morphed into lying. This turns into a Mad Hatter's Tea Party. This happens to vast, sophisticated corporations

Somebody has to step in and say, "We're not going to do it-it's just too hard."

I think a good litmus test of the mental and moral quality at any large institution [with significant derivatives exposure] would be to ask them, "Do you really understand your derivatives book?" Anyone who says yes is either crazy or lying. In engineering, people have a big margin of safety. But in the financial world, people don't give a damn about safety. They let it balloon and balloon and balloon. It's aided by false accounting. I'm more pessimistic about this than Warren. Derivatives are full of clauses that say if one party's credit gets downgraded, then it has to put up collateral. It's like margin-you can go broke [just putting up more margin]. In attempting to protect themselves, they've introduced instability. Nobody seems to recognize what a disaster of a system they've created. It's a demented system.

It's easy to see [the dangers] when you talk about [what happened with] the energy derivatives-they went kerflooey. When [the companies] reached for the assets that were on their books, the money wasn't there. When it comes to financial assets, we haven't had any such denouement, and the accounting hasn't changed, so the denouement is ahead of us.

Likelihood of a Derivatives Blowup

I hate with a passion GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] as applied to derivatives and swaps. JP Morgan sold out to this type of accounting to front-end revenues. I think it's a disgrace.

"To say accounting for derivatives in America is a sewer is an insult sewage."

It [accounting for derivatives] is just disgusting. It is a sewer, and if I'm right, there will be hell to pay in due course. All of you will have to prepare to deal with a blowup of derivative books. It's bonkers, and the accountants sold out. Everyone caved, adopted loose [accounting] standards, and created exotic derivatives linked to theoretical models. As a result, all kinds of earnings, blessed by accountants, are not really being earned. When you reach for the money, it melts away. It was never there. We tried to sell Gen Re's derivatives operation and couldn't, so we started liquidating it. We had to take big markdowns. I would confidently predict that most of the derivative books of [this country's] major banks cannot be liquidated for anything like what they're carried on the books at. When the denouement will happen and how severe it will be, I don't know. But I fear the consequences could be fearsome. I think there are major problems, worse than in the energy field, and look at the destruction there.

I'll be amazed if we don't have some kind of significant [derivatives-related] blowup in the next five to ten years.

I think we're the only big corporation in America to be running off its derivative book. It's a crazy idea for people who are already rich-like Berkshire-to be in this business. It's a crazy business for big banks to be in.

That was Charlie Munger in May of 2002.

In high school I had a teacher who used to check the math homework in class by sitting at his desk in the front of class and asking us, one by one, from across the room, if we did the homework. He informed us at the beginning of the year that it was a honor system, and lying was certainly an option -- but on any random day he might come around and actually verify whether or not you were telling the truth about having completed your homework. If you were lying, you'd get a triple zero, instead of just a zero. That's kind of thing can really fuck your grade up. Being caught in a lie would cause everyone /else/ to be checked as well, so your folly could cause a chain reaction of triple zeroes.

He didn't check very often, but occasionally, some kid would get on his nerves, be a bad liar, and you knew there was going to be fallout. Everybody who didn't do the homework would then heap lots of blame on the kid who sucked at lying, but in the end, the problem was the fact that half the class wasn't doing their goddamned homework. Of course, the way the system was set up probably didn't help, but that doesn't mean it wasn't technically fair.

People feel cheated when they do what is required of them and nobody pays attention -- but over a lifetime, it's a good strategy because it does not require you to foresee the unforeseeable. While it's completely true that you can get risky and then get out before your clever plans collapse upon themselves, it is also true that this can all blow up in your face. The biggest fish in the water is the one that never gets caught.

On the other hand, you can't completely blame the motivations of the investment bankers as pure greed either -- If everybody around you is cheating, uh, creatively interpreting risk and getting 15% on investments, and you're playing by the rules and getting 12%, well, how much longer are you going to get to keep your job? That doesn't justify it, but it partially explains things. When everybody is engaged in a giant collective delusion, there can be significant costs for your lack of participation -- just ask any powerful atheist politician, haha, oh wait.

(8 comments | comment on this)

Monday, September 8th, 2008
The difference between a lottery and an election is, in the extremely unlikely statistically improbable event that your ticket/vote is actually the one that matters, in one instance you get millions of dollars, and in another, you just get some douchehat.

(40 comments | comment on this)

Sunday, September 7th, 2008

(3 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008
Poll #1235644 poll without unifying theme
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 209

Have you ever used the word "delightful" in a non-ironic fashion?

View Answers

yes
128 (61.8%)

no
79 (38.2%)

If you used the word "*HUGZ*" to offer what appears to be empathy to someone over the internet, given their experience with your personality -- would the recipient want to punch you in the face?

View Answers

yes
120 (58.0%)

no
87 (42.0%)

If someone were to offer you $15,000, would you agree to never partake in an intoxicating substance for the rest of your life? (if it happened of your own will, the money would be due back in full with 15% interest per year tacked on)

View Answers

yes
60 (28.7%)

no
149 (71.3%)

Presuming you like your dad, if someone tried to kill your dad, would you do everything in your power to return the favor?

View Answers

yes
45 (22.0%)

no
119 (58.0%)

yes, even if it meant i had to become the president
41 (20.0%)

Would you take a lump sum of five million dollars in exchange for becoming a passive consumer never able to contribute to society in any way, even creatively?

View Answers

yes
53 (25.6%)

no
154 (74.4%)

If you suddenly care about gymnastics once every 4 years...

View Answers

you don't actually give a shit about gymnastics
180 (100.0%)

Are you a jealous person, in terms of relationships?

View Answers

yes
38 (18.3%)

i don't think so, but the others have said that i am
6 (2.9%)

yes, but it only started after somebody cheated on me and then i heretofore became insane
13 (6.2%)

yes, but i have always been like that, and then somebody cheated on me because i kept accusing them of it, so there was barely a difference
0 (0.0%)

i used to be
29 (13.9%)

no
54 (26.0%)

no to the point where others probably get mad at my lack of concern
47 (22.6%)

i have no past experience, so i don't know
9 (4.3%)

no comment
12 (5.8%)



added: With regard the the intoxicating substance question -- you're allowed prescription medication for the prescribed purposes.

If you have ever been/are currently with an insanely jealous person, you can tell a horror story in the comments, if you're allowed. If your internet access goes dead as you type the comment, you're probably not allowed.

(63 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, July 24th, 2008
Poll #1228988 irl trolls, jobs
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 173

Who is the most effective in-real-life troll?

View Answers

Al Sharpton
8 (5.1%)

Ann Coulter
53 (33.8%)

Bill O'Reilly
30 (19.1%)

Eminem
3 (1.9%)

Fred Phelps (Westboro Baptist Church)
34 (21.7%)

Howard Stern
6 (3.8%)

Hugo Chavez
3 (1.9%)

Michael Moore
16 (10.2%)

Nancy Grace
4 (2.5%)

I have a write-in troll candidate:

Only Males Answer: Do you care if a girl you may potentially date has the ability to hold down a job?

View Answers

yes
38 (74.5%)

no
13 (25.5%)

Only Females Answer: Do you care if a guy you may potentially date has the ability to hold down a job?

View Answers

yes
110 (91.7%)

no
10 (8.3%)



The IRL troll poll is to measure abilities as a troll, not to express personal feelings about the troll in question. Always use as directed. Here's a description of trolling for the uninformed.

(57 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, July 10th, 2008
hannah montana's bag of


So you're saying I have to chew on this uh, sour microphone... if i want to be a 'special secret rock star,' is that what you're saying -- is that correct? And none of my friends will know about this, because I can't tell them. Got it.

(31 comments | comment on this)

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008
"I'm happy to tell you there is very little in this world that I believe in. Listening to the comedians who comment on political, social, and cultural issues, I notice most of their material reflects an underlying belief that somehow things were better once and that with just a little effort we could set them right again. They're looking for solutions, and rooting for particular results, and I think that necessarily limits the tone and substance of what they say. They're talented and funny people, but they're nothing more than cheerleaders attached to a specific, wished-for outcome.

I don't feel so confined. I frankly don't give a fuck how it all turns out in this country - or anywhere else, for that matter. I think the human game was up a long time ago (when the high priests and traders took over), and now we're just playing out the string. And that is, of course, precisely what I find so amusing: the slow circling of the drain by a once promising species, and the sappy, ever-more-desperate belief in this country that there is actually some sort of "American Dream," which has merely been misplaced.

The decay and disintegration of this culture is astonishingly amusing if you are emotionally detached from it. I have always viewed it from a safe distance, knowing I don't belong; it doesn't include me, and it never has. No matter how you care to define it, I do not identify with the local group. Planet, species, race, nation, state, religion, party, union, club, association, neighborhood, improvement committee; I have no interest in any of it. I love and treasure individuals as I meet them, I loathe and despise the groups they identify with and belong to.

So, if you read something in this book that sounds like advocacy of a particular political point of view, please reject the notion. My interest in "issues" is merely to point out how badly we're doing, not to suggest a way we might do better. Don't confuse me with those who cling to hope. I enjoy describing how things are, I have no interest in how they "ought to be." And I certainly have no interest in fixing them. I sincerely believe that if you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem. My motto: Fuck Hope.

P.S. Lest you wonder, personally, I am a joyful individual with a long, happy marriage and a close and loving family. My career has turned out better than I ever dreamed, and continues to expand. I am a personal optimist but skeptic about all else. What may sound to some like anger is really nothing more than sympathetic contempt. I view my species with a combination of wonder and pity, and I root for its destruction. And please don't confuse my point of view with cynicism; the real cynics are the ones who tell you everything's gonna be all right.

P.P.S. By the way, if, by chance, you folks do manage to straighten things out and make everything better, I still don't wish to be included."

-George Carlin

(11 comments | comment on this)

Monday, June 2nd, 2008
Whenever I post to twitter, an assortment of super douchey guys who don't even care what I just said start 'following' me. This must be what it feels like to be a hot girl ALL THE TIME.

(27 comments | comment on this)

Friday, May 30th, 2008
I like it when CNN has a story where they're trying to communicate to you that the whole story that they are reporting to you is bullshit, but they can't tell you the actual truth because they don't have any evidence. In place of news, you get non-news that hints at actual reality with quote marks.



http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Music/05/30/steven.tyler.rehab.ap/index.html?iref=mpstoryview


Steven Tyler wanted a "safe environment" to recover from his foot surgery. Because you know, when you're a decamillionaire, the only way you can pull off having some space to yourself 'cause your FUCKIN' FOOT HURTS is to check yourself into rehab. IT'S THE ONLY WAY! I mean, what other recourse do you have? There aren't that many other options for you out there.

current music: NOT AEROSMITH

(21 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008
Poll #1194673 nervous habits
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 230

I'm a

View Answers

leg shaker
132 (60.6%)

cheek / lip biter
116 (53.2%)

finger eater
57 (26.1%)

knuckle cracker
89 (40.8%)

nail biter
78 (35.8%)

finger drummer
55 (25.2%)

whistler / hummer
34 (15.6%)

body rocker
39 (17.9%)

hair twirler
71 (32.6%)

ice crusher (with straw)
34 (15.6%)

gum snapper
19 (8.7%)

Other habit of note:

(30 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, May 8th, 2008
The other day I got one of those val-pak coupon packet things you get in the mail, you know the one that has all those ads for removing toxic mold and gutter cleaning and stuff? Well, inside that packet was an ad for this:


Our Love Clock(tm)


You see, it's.. a clock. And I think, what one of you do is, you set the hands according to your mood, or, wait, no, they do? I guess one of you is the long hand and one of you is the short hand, and then -- well, I guess you, you establish this of course, beforehand -- with a system. You've got to iron that out. Someone has got to be the long hand and someone else the short hand.

So, okay, let's start over.

You establish a system where each person has a hand, and then, each day, each of you in secrecy sets the hands of the clock to communicate to the other person whether or not you're going to have sex, and then each of you, in secrecy, views the clock and sees what the diagnosis is. And this helps you with communication in your relationship.

But wait, also, the battery is not included -- but it can use batteries? Which is confusing, because let's say it's ASAP and NOW, well, if you wait five minutes, then it's ASAP and SICK and OH SNAP, you missed your window. Cape Canaveral to White Sands, we missed our window, over.

But, forget all of that, because instead, what I am currently believing is that there is no way that this thing can possibly, actually exist, and rather, it's some avant garde artistic statement, or better yet, an experiment to see if anyone would actually buy one. But the experiment doesn't end there! No. The plan is, that if anyone does actually buy one, agents will be dispatched to the delivery address who will then capture the purchasing party and return them to a laboratory for further analysis and dissection.

See, that's how I deal with a lot of stuff. I mean, that COULD be true, right? I'm not saying it is, but it's a possibility, however remote. If I can conceive of something like that, someone else could too. It could happen. It could. It might.

It could.

(26 comments | comment on this)

Monday, May 5th, 2008
Things that are wrong today:

1. CNN.com keeps referring to that guy who kept his daughter hostage in his basement to sexually assault her and force her to have his babies as "Incest Dad". That's a rather brief shorthand, isn't it? For whatever reason, this has made me switch around the lyrics to Pavement's 1994 song "Silence Kid" to "Incest Dad" in my head, and I'm probably never going to be able to switch them back because the song still works.

2. CNN now also allows you to order shirts of specific news story titles? But not other ones. I wonder whose job it is to decide which headlines can be put on tee shirts and which headlines cannot? They never let you put Incest Dad headlines on tee shirts, though they DO allow you, at least today... for a limited time only, to get "Bleeding, greasy man stuck in vent" put on a shirt, because apparently, fuck that guy.

The selling point of these shirts, as far as I can see, is that CNN knows it has mostly lost any semblance of journalistic integrity and now they are trying to make money on the fact that you have realized this also.

3. Last week they did a series of stories on what they call "Man Caves," special rooms that dudes (who have wives/girlfriends) have set up in their houses full of things that "dudes" enjoy, like beer, pool tables, posters, video games and crying softly to themselves behind the water heater clutching a pez dispenser wondering what the fuck happened to their lives. You know, guy stuff - no women allowed! A place to pretend that people who ride motorcycles are cool and not old, fat and sad. GUY STUFF. Lets play cards!

As far as I can tell, Man Caves are akin to what Indian Reservations are to the United States. The large powerful entity who actually controls things throws you a bone and tells you that you are permitted to do whatever you want on this sucky patch of land that nobody else wants. Hey, go crazy! What a great deal! Step outside that land though, and you are subject to the real and actual laws of the United States and you must also use a coaster and remove your shoes before walking on the good carpet.

NEWSFLASH: The Indians lost, and so did you. Plus, T-rex was right.

4. Of course, points 1-3 signify that I am partially responsible for CNN's rapid journalistic decline. And I know this, maaan.

current music: pavement - incest dad

(44 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, April 24th, 2008
When the public finds out that a male teacher has been sleeping with a young teenage female student, we want this predator prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for taking advantage of an innocent young girl.

When the public finds out that a female teacher has been sleeping with a young teenage male student, we would like to know how hot she is.

(39 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, February 21st, 2008


I was in a sushi place the other day with my girlfriend. We were on the subject of squinting, and how it's weird that when you squint, to a degree it actually works -- you can actually see more clearly! That's weird, I know how it works, but it's weird. I mentioned that pulling on the sides of your eyes also works if you forget your glasses...

"but it would probably be a bad idea to do that here."

I of course, said this about a second before her hands immediately went up to the sides of her face.

"Why not?" she said, pulling back on the sides of her eyes, looking around the restaurant.

"Think about where you are right now" I said.

"What?"

"..."

"It will come to you!"

"WHAT?"

"Oh! ohhhhh."

And so I decided not order the blowfish after all, etc etc.

*** I had a poll here where I asked "Which is more offensive -- being called a racial slur, or being called the WRONG racial slur. It was broken though, so no poll for you. ***

my take on this question )

(56 comments | comment on this)

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007


Anna: that is a totally ridiculous way of doing it. just move the decimal point over one place and double it!

2.7 + 2.7 = 5.4!

The lady has point. I was unaware of either of these things until about an hour ago.

Edit: There is a tipping battle going on in the comments over here. COME ON, FIGHT ME.

(96 comments | comment on this)

Monday, November 26th, 2007
An MC5 MD5 (lowercase, comma, exclamation point)

hash: 2ddb003be273e7123c8256c9e32faf80

(18 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, November 20th, 2007
Hello! I am going to start posting more dorky stuff, which means much less quality for you. But, what can you do.

I was just messing around with Google Trends, which I am sure will be my eventual downfall. Basically, it gives you popularity graphs of things being searched for and can break them down by geographic location and time period.


Google Trends - "Bankruptcy" and "Foreclosure"


According to my little Google Trends experiment, the state of Nevada, in particular, Las Vegas Nevada has the most searches for both "bankruptcy" and "foreclosure" of any location in the United States. My hypothesis is that people are taking what meager funds they have left and gambling them in a last ditch effort to hold on to their property in the face of the subprime loan crisis (although they probably do this when there is no crisis as well).

It is interesting, and somewhat unfortunate, that the same people who fail to scrutinize the ramifications of a deal they are getting when signing the papers for a mortgage are also the people who are not able to fully grasp the unlikelihood of beating the house in Vegas.

Other discoveries:

Salt Lake City, Utah is the location that searches for "Pregnancy" the most, as well as "Ovulation." Initially I thought this was because Mormons are all about reproduction, but, my new hypothesis is that Mormons are also all about NOT reproduction, but due to their cultural restrictions against the use of contraception they are doing Google searches to learn how to Hax0r the uterus with TIMING. They are also #1 for searches involving "World of Warcraft", which, in my opinion, is its own form of contraception, so I call shenanigans on you, Salt Lake City.

Quickies:

New York, New York is winning at Tax Fraud. Irvine, California is winning at Irony. Charlotte, North Carolina is winning at NASCAR. Austin, Texas is winning at Monkeys? Boston, Massachusetts is winning at Rehab (and also Nausea).

The yearly graph of "diet" is also pretty funny.

(46 comments | comment on this)

Monday, November 19th, 2007
http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2007/11/you-bet-my-comm.html

Remember Fitness Blackmail? I snooze, I lose

(14 comments | comment on this)

Friday, November 9th, 2007
Have you ever had a dream about someone, and when you woke up you found that you had changed your opinion about them completely, even though absolutely no facts had changed?

I bet that's pretty common.

I hate it. If you can't control what you dream about and what the subsequent effects are, who exactly is running the show here?

(52 comments | comment on this)

Saturday, September 15th, 2007
Removing your marital status from MySpace suddenly doesn't work anymore. They fixed it and now do form validation. It's all like 1994 over there now. Crazy. I wonder if they fixed it because I discovered and basically publicized the fact that they didn't? My site was getting a ton of hits.

For any of you out there who use MySpace, I think everyone can agree that it sucks and is broken and has always been. That's fine.

What I have a hard time wrapping my mind around is the fact that it was bought for 580 million dollars (really, 580 million dollars, that is not some number I just made up) a year or two ago and it looks like Tom is still running the thing out of his mom's basement. What the hell is going on over there? Are they trying to maintain some sort of "indie cred" by keeping the site as shitty as possible? I also want to know: When "Tom" posts those emergency bulletins about scams and software bugs that might be occurring on the site, is it actually him, or is it someone else who is trying to emulate the completely retarded way he puts together a sentence lol?

TELL ME.

(38 comments | comment on this)

Friday, September 14th, 2007
The other day outside there was a squirrel sitting up in the tree on a low branch making the 'upset squirrel noise'. You know, the one that goes something like "ret ret ret, reeehh?'. The last part ends up being a squirrel question because the squirrel seems to make a sentence with his anger. At the very end it gets higher, just like a question does?

You can turn statements into questions in English by changing the pitch of your voice at the end? Are you doing that in your head? Or maybe you just started, because you can read without imagining what the words sound like until you start thinking about it, and then it's very difficult to eradicate the sounds of the words that you're reading because you're thinking about them, just like it's hard to get back to involuntary breathing and blinking once you start thinking about those. I've written about that before, but, for a moment, think about blinking and breathing. You don't do it very often, but when you do, it's hard to turn the reigns back over to the involuntary process that normally regulates such things, because they just happen and you don't really tend to focus on it. So, you're all thinkin' bout blinkin' and your eyes are getting watery because you don't even KNOW how much you normally blink. You're probably over-blinking right now, actually. I'M ALL UP IN YOUR HEAD, MAN.

Anyway.

That a question is a thing with a pitch that gets higher at the end is obvious, but it's not obvious. You do it, but you may not know that that is what makes a question a question -- it's an intuitive language rule you probably just picked up on.

Anyway 2, back to our squirrel friend. He's yelling. Sort of at me, actually. And he's angry. So I assume he's saying "Do you want to fight me?" "Do YOU want to fight ME?"

So I walked over the tree and said "I DON'T KNOW, DO YOU WANT TO FIGHT ME?"

It was at this point I noticed a coworker walk around the corner, with me threatening and pointing at the squirrel in the tree. I think someone else would be embarrassed, but it's a completely valid question. Maybe the squirrel wants to fight me. Maybe it will finally come down to fisticuffs today. This aggression will not stand.

(46 comments | comment on this)

Sunday, September 2nd, 2007
Here is an mp3 from a radio show I did a couple weeks ago (some of you may have heard it already):

Second Radio Break [8.3 megabyte mp3 file]

It has some funny non-reading-titles-of-songs near the end, but anyway, THE QUESTION:

Poll #1048939 his master's voice
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 58

Do I sound anything like you thought I might sound like before hearing my voice?

View Answers

yes
34 (58.6%)

no
24 (41.4%)



EDIT )

(24 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007
I keep hearing "When You Were Young" by The Killers on the radio. It's the song where the guy sings "Heee doesn't look a thing like Jeeeesus" in it somewhere. I refuse to look his name up. Weirdly, this song reminds me of Big Country's song "Big Country," as does a new Smashing Pumpkins song I keep hearing on the radio. Neither of them are my thing, I just wonder when everybody went and decided to start sounding like Big Country.

EDIT: I edited together the two tracks, you tell me:
The Big Country Killers - When You Were A Young Big Country [mp3 clip]

In my imagination, this happened like in Back to the Future where writer/director Robert Zemeckis steals the invention of Rock and Roll from Chuck Berry/black people with time travel -- except it's some guy slightly off stage at a Big Country concert who calls up The Killers and Billy Corgan on threeway:

"Hello! This is your cousin? Cousin EXPOSITION? You know that NEW SOUND you're looking for, well LISTEN to THIS."

I had an idea a while back that a good way to hurry along the coming apocalypse would be to host a concert featuring Big Country and Bad Company called BC2. The entire concert would consist of 45 minute renditions of two songs-whose-title-and-chorus-are-also-the-name-of-the-band: "Big Country" and "Bad Company."



Only, Big Country would play "Bad Company" and Bad Company would play "Big Country". Maybe Big Country could rename themselves Bad Country, and Bad Company could become Big Company? I don't know. I do know that the occurrence of this event would alter the fundamental properties of the universe, sending it hurtling into a state of chaos the likes of which are unable to be conceived by the human mind. And that we should do it.

current music: 3 people know who bad company & big country are BUT I DON'T CARE

(34 comments | comment on this)